![]() Because an appeal waiver stands or falls with a guilty plea, see United States v. But Epps s broad waiver of his right to appeal makes this case frivolous. Counsel does consider whether Epps could argue that the district court (1) erred in calculating the proper guidelines range or (2) imposed an unreasonable sentence. ![]() Epps has told counsel not to contest his guilty plea, and so counsel properly forgoes discussing the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. We confine our review to counsel s facially adequate brief. Epps has not responded to counsel s motion. Epps filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer believes that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw under Anders v. The district court sentenced him to the 48-month statutory maximum. In his plea agreement Epps waived the right to appeal his sentence. ORDER Jessie Epps pleaded guilty to using a telephone to facilitate a heroin trafficking crime. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. ![]() 12-3256 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WOOD, Circuit Judge JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge DAVID F. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted MaDecided MaBefore DIANE P. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |